Governance and Regulation of New Economy Companies: The Role of Human Capital.

Copp, S., Hardwick, P., Teather, R. and Yang, J. Z., 2004. Governance and Regulation of New Economy Companies: The Role of Human Capital. Discussion Paper. London: Worshipful Company of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators. (Unpublished)

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF (Word to PDF conversion (via antiword) conversion from application/msword to application/pdf) - Submitted Version
492kB

Abstract

There has been much publicity surrounding “new economy” companies, a term embracing “dot.com”, “high-tech” and “innovative high growth” companies, amongst others. Whilst such generic terminology serves to obscure the very real differences between such companies, they are generally thought to be an important factor in economic growth despite fears as to their volatility. In economic terms such companies potentially present a number of difficulties relating to judgement problems, information asymmetry, asset specificity, imperfectly competitive markets and measurement. Such distinguishing features give rise to a high probability of market failure and may be argued to have played a significant role in the “dot.com crash”. In particular, it is thought that the role played by human capital and the associated problem of human asset specificity, poses special problems. Such difficulties may provide a justification for state intervention to regulate such companies and, in particular, their governance. This paper evaluates the the legal and regulatory framework for the governance of human capital in new economy companies by reference to the competing or complementary regulatory goals of efficiency, good governance, innovation and human capital. It further illustrates the practical effect of this framework by means of a survey of prospectuses of a sample of 50 companies listed on the Techmark index selected from three relevant groupings of sectors, which included health related, computer hardware, telecommunications and computing services companies, and related annual reports and accounts. It concludes by identifying examples of inappropriate regulation and making proposals for reform.

Item Type:Monograph (Discussion Paper)
Additional Information:Commissioned and Sponsored by the Worshipful Company of Chartered Secretaries and Administrators
Subjects:UNSPECIFIED
Group:Business School
ID Code:3337
Deposited By:INVALID USER
Deposited On:23 May 2007
Last Modified:07 Mar 2013 14:39

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -
BU Staff Only -
Help Guide - Editing Your Items in BURO