Skip to main content

Reviewing the use of resilience concepts in forest sciences.

Nikinmaa, L., Lindner, M., Cantarello, E., Jump, A., Seidl, R., Winkel, G. and Muys, B., 2020. Reviewing the use of resilience concepts in forest sciences. Current Forestry Reports, 6, 61-80.

Full text available as:

[img] PDF
Nikinmaa et al reviewed manuscript_170120_EiC_ln.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 11 February 2021.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

937kB

DOI: 10.1007/s40725-020-00110-x

Abstract

Purpose of the review Resilience is a key concept to deal with an uncertain future in forestry. In recent years, it has received increasing attention from both research and practice. However, a common understanding of what resilience means in a forestry context, and how to operationalise it is lacking. Here, we conducted a systematic review of the recent forest science literature on resilience in the forestry context, synthesising how resilience is defined and assessed. Recent findings Based on a detailed review of 255 studies, we analysed how the concepts of engineering resilience, ecological resilience, and social-ecological resilience are used in forest sciences. A clear majority of the studies applied the concept of engineering resilience, quantifying resilience as the recovery time after a disturbance. The two most used indicators for engineering resilience were basal area increment and vegetation cover, whereas ecological resilience studies frequently focus on vegetation cover and tree density. In contrast, important social-ecological resilience indicators used in the literature are socio-economic diversity and stock of natural resources. In the context of global change, we expected an increase in studies adopting the more holistic social-ecological resilience concept, but this was not the observed trend. Summary Our analysis points to the nestedness of these three resilience concepts, suggesting that they are complementary rather than contradictory. It also means that the variety of resilience approaches does not need to be an obstacle for operationalisation of the concept. We provide guidance for choosing the most suitable resilience concept and indicators based on the management, disturbance and application context.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:2198-6436
Uncontrolled Keywords:forest management; engineering resilience; ecological resilience; social48 ecological resilience; disturbance; indicators
Group:Faculty of Science & Technology
ID Code:33420
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:14 Feb 2020 12:44
Last Modified:06 Jul 2020 15:27

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -