Pickering, C.J., O'Sullivan, T.L., Morris, A., Mark, C., McQuirk, D., Chan, E.Y.Y., Guy, E., Chan, G.K.W., Reddin, K., Throp, R., Tsuzuki, S., Yeung, T. and Murray, V., 2018. The Promotion of ‘Grab Bags’ as a Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy. PLOS Currents Disasters.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
The Promotion of Grab Bags.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 695kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1371/currents.dis.223ac4322834aa0bb0d6824ee424e7f8
Abstract
Introduction: An all-of-society approach to disaster risk reduction emphasizes inclusion and engagement in preparedness activities. A common recommendation is to promote household preparedness through the preparation of a ‘grab bag’ or ‘disaster kit’, that can be used to shelter-in-place or evacuate. However, there are knowledge gaps related to how this strategy is being used around the world as a disaster risk reduction strategy, and what evidence there is to support recommendations. Methods: In this paper, we present an exploratory study undertaken to provide insight into how grab bag guidelines are used to promote preparedness in Canada, China, England, Japan, and Scotland, and supplemented by a literature review to understand existing evidence for this strategy. Results: There are gaps in the literature regarding evidence on grab bag effectiveness. We also found variations in how grab bag guidelines are promoted across the five case studies. Discussion: While there are clearly common items recommended for household grab bags (such as water and first aid kits), there are gaps in the literature regarding: 1) the evidence base to inform guidelines; 2) uptake of guidelines; and 3) to what extent grab bags reduce demands on essential services and improve disaster resilience.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2157-3999 |
Group: | Bournemouth University Business School |
ID Code: | 33436 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 18 Feb 2020 12:35 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:20 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |