Husted, M., Seiss, E. and Banks, A.P., 2019. The relationship between dietary restraint and deficits in reasoning about causes of obesity. Psychology and Health, 34 (12), 1504 - 1522.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Husted Seiss & Banks PH_2019CCR_Accepted Version.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 798kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1623890
Abstract
Objective: Increased levels of dietary restraint are associated with deficits on many cognitive tasks. Less is known about how individual differences in restraint influences complex cognition such as reasoning which is the focus of this research.Design: Two experimental studies are reported. In study 1, participants (n = 158) completed a causal conditional reasoning task with statements about weight-related and general causal relationships. Study 2 replicated and extended study 1. Participants (n = 108) completed a causal conditional reasoning task focusing on behavioural causes of weight change or general statements.Main outcome measure: Causal conditional reasoning task performance.Results: In study 1, levels of dietary restraint were negatively associated with reasoning abilities for weight-related statements only. Study 2 replicated the negative association between dietary restraint and reasoning finding the effect in both weight-related, and general, causal judgements.Conclusion: The novel findings show that individual differences in dietary restraint have a wider relationship with cognition than previously demonstrated. Results tentatively support theoretical explanations of a reduction in cognitive capacity, rather than differences in belief, explaining reasoning deficits. These findings open an interesting avenue for research and might have implications for effective decision making about personal health behaviours, such as food choice.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0887-0446 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Reasoning ; eating behaviour ; food choice ; obesity education ; restraint |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 33589 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 21 Apr 2020 15:27 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:20 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |