Skip to main content

Tumour subregion analysis of colorectal liver metastases using semi-automated clustering based on DCE-MRI: Comparison with histological subregions and impact on pharmacokinetic parameter analysis.

Franklin, J.M., Irving, B., Papiez, B.W., Kallehauge, J.F., Wang, L.M., Goldin, R.D., Harris, A.L., Anderson, E.M., Schnabel, J.A., Chappell, M.A., Brady, M., Sharma, R.A. and Gleeson, F.V., 2020. Tumour subregion analysis of colorectal liver metastases using semi-automated clustering based on DCE-MRI: Comparison with histological subregions and impact on pharmacokinetic parameter analysis. European Journal of Radiology, 126 (May), 108934.

Full text available as:

[img] PDF
EJR - Tumour Subregion Analysis - Manuscript 18120 CLEAN.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 6 March 2021.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

778kB

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108934

Abstract

PURPOSE: To use a novel segmentation methodology based on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) to define tumour subregions of liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC), to compare these with histology, and to use these to compare extracted pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters between tumour subregions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This ethically-approved prospective study recruited patients with CRC and ≥1 hepatic metastases scheduled for hepatic resection. Patients underwent DCE-MRI pre-metastasectomy. Histological sections of resection specimens were spatially matched to DCE-MRI acquisitions and used to define histological subregions of viable and non-viable tumour. A semi-automated voxel-wise image segmentation algorithm based on the DCE-MRI contrast-uptake curves was used to define imaging subregions of viable and non-viable tumour. Overlap of histologically-defined and imaging subregions was compared using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). DCE-MRI PK parameters were compared for the whole tumour and histology-defined and imaging-derived subregions. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the analysis. Direct histological comparison with imaging was possible in nine patients. Mean DSC for viable tumour subregions defined by imaging and histology was 0.738 (range 0.540-0.930). There were significant differences between Ktrans and kep for viable and non-viable subregions (p < 0.001) and between whole lesions and viable subregions (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate good concordance of viable tumour segmentation based on pre-operative DCE-MRI with a post-operative histological gold-standard. This can be used to extract viable tumour-specific values from quantitative image analysis, and could improve treatment response assessment in clinical practice.

Item Type:Article
ISSN:0720‐048X
Uncontrolled Keywords:Colorectal neoplasm ; Liver neoplasm ; MRI ; Perfusion imaging
Group:Faculty of Health & Social Sciences
ID Code:34559
Deposited By: Unnamed user with email symplectic@symplectic
Deposited On:17 Sep 2020 10:59
Last Modified:17 Sep 2020 10:59

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

More statistics for this item...
Repository Staff Only -