Aughterson, H., Baxter, L. and Fancourt, D., 2020. Social prescribing for individuals with mental health problems: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers experienced by general practitioners. BMC Family Practice, 21 (1), 194.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (Open access article)
s12875-020-01264-0.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB | |
PDF
GP COM-B SP study FINAL - revised (003).pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only 449kB | ||
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1186/s12875-020-01264-0
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is growing evidence for the use of social prescribing as a means to improve the mental health of patients. However, there are gaps in understanding the barriers and enablers faced by General Practitioners (GPs) when engaging in social prescribing for patients with mental health problems. METHODS: This study uses a qualitative approach involving one-to-one interviews with GPs from across the UK. The COM-B model was used to elucidate barriers and enablers, and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and a Behaviour Change Theory and Techniques tool was used to identify interventions that could address these. RESULTS: GPs recognised the utility of social prescribing in addressing the high levels of psychosocial need they saw in their patient population, and expressed the need to de-medicalise certain patient problems. GPs were driven by a desire to help patients, and so they benefited from regular positive feedback to reinforce the value of their social prescribing referrals. They also discussed the importance of developing more robust evidence on social prescribing, but acknowledged the challenges of conducting rigorous research in community settings. GPs lacked the capacity, and formal training, to effectively engage with community groups for patients with mental health problems. Link workers, when available to GPs, were of fundamental importance in bridging the gap between the GP and community. The formation of trusting relationships was crucial at different points of the social prescribing pathway, with patients needing to trust GPs in order for them to agree to see a link worker or attend a community activity, and GPs requiring a range of strong inter-personal skills in order to gain patients' trust and motivate them. CONCLUSION: This study elucidates the barriers and enablers to social prescribing for patients with mental health problems, from the perspectives of GPs. Recommended interventions include a more systematic feedback structure for GPs and more formal training around social prescribing and developing the relevant inter-personal skills. This study provides insight for GPs and other practice staff, commissioners, managers, providers and community groups, to help design and deliver future social prescribing services.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1471-2296 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Behaviour(al) change theory ; COM-B ; Community ; Community engagement ; GP behaviour ; General practice (GP) ; Mental health ; Social prescribing ; Theoretical domains framework (TDF) ; United Kingdom (UK) |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 34796 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 11 Nov 2020 16:26 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:24 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |