Bennett, M. R., Bustos, D., Odess, D., Urban, T.M., Lallensack, J.N., Budka, M., Santucci, V.L., Martinez, P., Wiseman, A.L.A. and Reynolds, S. C., 2020. Walking in mud: Remarkable Pleistocene human trackways from White Sands National Park (New Mexico). Quaternary Science Reviews, 249 (Dec.), 106610.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Walking_in_mud_MS.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 395kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2020.106610
Abstract
Human tracks at White Sands National Park record more than one and a half kilometres of an out‐ and‐back journey and form the longest Late Pleistocene‐age double human trackway in the world. An adolescent or small adult female made two trips separated by at least several hours, carrying a young child in at least one direction. Despite giant ground sloth and Columbian Mammoth transecting them between the outbound and return journeys, the human tracks show no changes indicative of predator/prey awareness. In contrast, the giant ground sloth tracks show behaviour consistent with human predator awareness, while mammoth tracks show no such apparent concern. The human footprints are morphologically variable and exhibit left‐right asymmetry, which might be due to child carrying. We explore this morphological variability using methods based on the analysis of objective track outlines, which add to the analytical toolkit available for use at other human footprint sites. The sheer number of tracks and their remarkable morphological variability have implications for the reliability of inferences made using much smaller samples as are more common at typical footprint sites. One conclusion is that the number of footprints required to make reliable biometric inferences is larger than often assumed.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0277-3791 |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 34821 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 13 Nov 2020 14:28 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:25 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |