Renault, A.G., Auvray, M., Parseihian, G., Miall, R.C., Cole, J. and Sarlegna, F.R., 2018. Does Proprioception Influence Human Spatial Cognition? A Study on Individuals With Massive Deafferentation. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, -.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
fpsyg-09-01322.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
When navigating in a spatial environment or when hearing its description, we can develop a mental model which may be represented in the central nervous system in different coordinate systems such as an egocentric or allocentric reference frame. The way in which sensory experience influences the preferred reference frame has been studied with a particular interest for the role of vision. The present study investigated the influence of proprioception on human spatial cognition. To do so, we compared the abilities to form spatial models of two rare participants chronically deprived of proprioception (GL and IW) and healthy control participants. Participants listened to verbal descriptions of a spatial environment, and their ability to form and use a mental model was assessed with a distance-comparison task and a free-recall task. Given that the loss of proprioception has been suggested to specifically impair the egocentric reference frame, the deafferented individuals were expected to perform worse than controls when the spatial environment was described in an egocentric reference frame. Results revealed that in both tasks, one deafferented individual (GL) made more errors than controls while the other (IW) made less errors. On average, both GL and IW were slower to respond than controls, and reaction time was more variable for IW. Additionally, we found that GL but not IW was impaired compared to controls in visuo-spatial imagery, which was assessed with the Minnesota Paper Form Board Test. Overall, the main finding of this study is that proprioception can influence the time necessary to use spatial representations while other factors such as visuo-spatial abilities can influence the capacity to form accurate spatial representations.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | mental model ; proprioception ; reference frame ; sensory neuropathy ; space representation |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 35177 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 09 Feb 2021 11:16 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:26 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |