Hofmeyr, G.J., Bernitz, S., Bonet, M., Bucagu, M., Dao, B., Downe, S., Galadanci, H., Homer, C.S.E., Hundley, V., Lavender, T., Levy, B., Lissauer, D., Lumbiganon, P., McConville, F.E., Pattinson, R., Qureshi, Z., Souza, J.P., Stanton, M.E., Ten Hoope-Bender, P., Vannevel, V., Vogel, J.P. and Oladapo, O.T., 2021. WHO next generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 128 (10), 1658-1662.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
1471-0528.16694.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 429kB | |
PDF
1471-0528.16694.pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 627kB | ||
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
In 1972, two landmark papers in this journal described the partograph,1,2 a chart designed to provide finite referral criteria for midwives working in peripheral clinics who needed to refer women in labour to Harare Hospital, Zimbabwe (then Rhodesia). This innovation coincided with influential reports from the National Maternity Hospital in Dublin of the 'active management of labour' (early amniotomy, proactive use of oxytocin and one-to-one nursing care) with the objective of achieving birth within a limited time frame.3 The partograph was globally adopted, and has been used as part of the assessment of labour progress for nearly half a century. It was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the early 1990s as a routine tool for displaying the progress of labour. Despite its global acceptance, utilization and correct completion rates as low as 31% and 3% respectively, have been reported.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1470-0328 |
Additional Information: | Research Funding This commentary was written without external funding. Open Access publication was supported by the UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), a cosponsored programme executed by the WHO. |
Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
ID Code: | 35279 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 16 Mar 2021 10:11 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:26 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |