Tools
ToolsHarvey, O., Taylor, A., Regmi, P. and van Teijlingen, E., 2022. Struggling to reply to reviewers: Some advice for novice researchers. Health Prospect: Journal of Public Health, 21 (2), 19-22.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Harvey et al reply to reviewers.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 92kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.3126/hprospect.v21i2.42907
Abstract
Peer review is key in academic publishing, and rejection (or at least being asked to resubmit your paper to the journal), is a not uncommon occurrence. However, receiving such rejection and having to reply to it can be hard for the early-career researcher. In this paper, we first highlight the role of the peer reviewer followed by some of the less friendly reviewers’ comments to our own submitted papers in four case studies. We conclude with several suggestions of ways to deal with less than positive reviews
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2091-2021 |
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | academic publishing; peer review |
| Group: | Faculty of Health & Social Sciences |
| ID Code: | 37248 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 21 Jul 2022 15:35 |
| Last Modified: | 21 Jul 2022 15:35 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |