Nguyen, A. and Catalan-Matamoros, D., 2022. Anti-Vaccine Discourse on Social Media: An Exploratory Audit of Negative Tweets about Vaccines and Their Posters. Vaccines, 10 (12), 2067.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
vaccines-10-02067-v2.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 316kB | |
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
Anti-vaccine tweets.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 398kB | ||
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10122067
Abstract
As the anti-vaccination movement is spreading around the world. This paper addresses the ever more urgent need for health professionals, communicators and policy-makers to grasp the nature of vaccine mis/disinformation on social media is more urgent than ever. A one-by-one coding of 4511 vaccine-related tweets posted from the UK in 2019 resulted in 334 anti-vaccine tweets. Our analysis shows that (a) anti-vaccine tweeters are quite active and widely networked users on their own; (b) anti-vaccine messages tend to focus on the “harmful” nature of vaccination, based mostly on personal experience, values and beliefs rather than hard facts; (c) anonymity does not make a difference to the types of posted anti-vaccine content, but does so in terms of the volume of such content. Communication initiatives against anti-vaccination should (a) work closely with technological platforms to tackle anonymous anti-vaccine tweets; (b) focus efforts on mis/disinformation in three major arears (in order of importance): the medical nature of vaccines, the belief that vaccination is a tool of manipulation and control for money and power, and the “freedom of health choice” discourse against mandatory vaccination; and (c) go beyond common factual measures—such as detecting, labelling or removing fake news—to address emotions induced by personal memories, values and beliefs.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2076-393X |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | vaccine hesitancy; anti-vaccination; fake news; misinformation; science controversy; anti-science |
Group: | Faculty of Media & Communication |
ID Code: | 37879 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 05 Dec 2022 15:16 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2022 15:15 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |