Tools
ToolsHardman, D., 2023. Unintentional deception still deceives. Journal of Medical Ethics. (In Press)
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Unintentional deception still deceives_Accepted Manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 82kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
In my recent article, Pretending to care, I argue that a better understanding of non-doxastic attitudes could improve our understanding of deception in clinical practice. In an insightful and well-argued response, Colgrove highlights three problems with my account. For the sake of brevity, in this reply I focus on the first: that my definition of deception is implausible because it does not involve intention. Although I concede that my initial broad definition needs modification, I argue that it should not be modified by involving intention but by involving responsibility.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0306-6800 |
| Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
| ID Code: | 37953 |
| Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
| Deposited On: | 11 Jan 2023 09:09 |
| Last Modified: | 11 Jan 2023 09:09 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |