Slattery, T. J., Angele, B. and Rayner, K., 2011. Eye Movements and Display Change Detection During Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37 (6), 1924-1938.
Full text available as:
|
PDF
Slattery Angele Rayner 2011.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. 522kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1037/a0024322
Abstract
In the boundary change paradigm (Rayner, 1975), when a reader's eyes cross an invisible boundary location, a preview word is replaced by a target word. Readers are generally unaware of such changes due to saccadic suppression. However, some readers detect changes on a few trials and a small percentage of them detect many changes. Two experiments are reported in which we combined eye movement data with signal detection analyses to investigate display change detection. On each trial, readers had to indicate if they saw a display change in addition to reading for meaning. On half the trials the display change occurred during the saccade (immediate condition); on the other half, it was slowed by 15-25 ms (delay condition) to increase the likelihood that a change would be detected. Sentences were presented in an alternating case fashion allowing us to investigate the influence of both letter identity and case. In the immediate condition, change detection was higher when letters changed than when case changed corroborating findings that word processing utilizes abstract (case independent) letter identities. However, in the delay condition (where d' was much higher than the immediate condition), detection was equal for letter and case changes. The results of both experiments indicate that sensitivity to display changes was related to how close the eyes were to the invalid preview on the fixation prior to the display change, as well as the timing of the completion of this change relative to the start of the post-change fixation. © 2011 American Psychological Association.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0096-1523 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Eye Movement Measurements; Eye Movements; Fixation, Ocular; Humans; Photic Stimulation; Reading; Saccades; Signal Detection, Psychological; Time Factors; Visual Perception |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 39480 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 08 Feb 2024 08:46 |
Last Modified: | 08 Feb 2024 08:46 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |