Bird, E., Wiener, J., Huang, C-Y. and Attard-Johnson, J., 2024. The efficacy of the Self-Administered Interview: A systematic review. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 21 (3), e1632.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
Journal Invest Psychology - 2024 - Bird - The efficacy of the Self‐Administered Interview A systematic review.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 467kB | |
PDF
Journal%20Invest%20Psychology%20-%202024%20-%20Bird%20-%20The%20efficacy%20of%20the%20Self%E2%80%90Administered%20Interview%20%20A%20systematic%20review.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 467kB | ||
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1002/jip.1632
Abstract
Obtaining accurate information from eyewitnesses is a crucial element in criminal investigations. Interview strategies such as the Cognitive Interview (CI) and the Self‐Administered Interview (SAI) have been developed and implemented to minimise inaccuracies and enhance the recall and reliability of eyewitness evidence. The SAI is a recent development within forensic psychology. However, a question remains as to the effectiveness of the SAI as an investigative interview tool. A systematic review of published studies employing the SAI was conducted (n = 22), and all were considered in relation to three variables (estimator, system and methodological). As the number of studies within the evidence base was relatively small, we could not ascertain whether the SAI is an effective investigative interviewing tool. However, the results demonstrate a number of positive benefits of the SAI. We discuss the implications of these findings for policy and directions for future research.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1544-4759 |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | eyewitness memory; eyewitness testimony; investigative interviewing; self‐administered interview; systematic review |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 39683 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 15 Apr 2024 15:49 |
Last Modified: | 02 Dec 2024 07:49 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |