Harvey, A., Kohli, S., Al-Nasser, S. and Noroozi, S., 2024. Gait analysis of a kinematic retaining implant for Total knee replacements during walking and running. Journal of Orthopaedics, 56, 1-5.
Full text available as:
PDF
Manuscript (1) (1).pdf - Accepted Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 28 February 2025. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. 190kB | |
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.02.025
Abstract
Background: The analysis of gait is an important tool for evaluating postoperative outcomes of a Total Knee Replacement (TKR). There are few studies which have evaluated the gait parameters of a Kinematic retaining (Kr) prosthesis. This study therefore aims to investigate the kinetic and kinematic differences of running and walking, in the ankle, knee and hip joints in patients who underwent a Kr TKR. Methods: This study assessed the gait of 12 patients with physica lima Kr TKRs at 1 year follow up and 8 healthy controls using 3D video analysis. Data was collected on the kinetics and kinematics of walking and running at the ankle, knee and hip. Comparison was made between the operated and non-operated limbs of the patients, and between the operated and control limbs. Results: Gait analysis showed no statistically significant difference in the hip, ankle and knee angles or moments between the non-operated and operated legs during walking and running. However, there was a statistically significant difference between the knee angles of initial contact, maximum flexion during stance and swing in the TKR knees vs controls in walking and running. Similarly, there was also a statistically significantly higher max knee flexion moment between operated knees and controls in both walking and running. Conclusion: This study has shown that a quadriceps avoidance gait persists in patients after TKR, and that there was symmetry and reciprocated gait parameters in non-operated limbs. These findings suggest that Kr TKRs could be capable of replicating normal knee kinematics when running and walking.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0972-978X |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 39852 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 16 May 2024 11:40 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 11:40 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |