Tools
ToolsGozlan, R. E., 2008. Correspondence: When Human Understanding of Fish Invasion is Blurred. PLoS Biology, 6 (2), 28.
Full text available as:
![[img]](/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
|
PDF
GOZLAN_PLoS_Biology.pdf - Published Version 22kB | |
|
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Official URL: http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=...
Abstract
Leprieur et al.’s observation that fish invasions are blurred by human activity (Leprieur et al. 2008 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060028) correctly reflected the well established understanding that fish invasion is human mediated (1-4). However, shortcomings in Leprieur et al’s (2008) article stem from confusion between introduction and invasion, a crude analysis of human activity which has lead to a misrepresentation of introduction hotspots and lastly, a misunderstanding of ecological impacts associated with non-native fish introduction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1545-7885 |
| Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
| ID Code: | 7906 |
| Deposited By: | INVALID USER |
| Deposited On: | 04 Dec 2008 20:32 |
| Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 13:18 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
| Repository Staff Only - |