Tauringana, V. and Chong, G., 2004. Neutrality of narrative discussion in annual reports of UK listed companies. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 7 (1), pp. 74-107.
Full text available as:
This paper reports the results of an investigation into the neutrality of the narrative discussion of financial performance and position, as evidenced in 179 annual reports of UK listed companies. Neutrality of narrative discussion was determined by comparing the average proportions of good and bad news contained in the narrative and statutory accounts sections of the annual reports. The results of a comparison of the proportion of good news in the two sections of the annual reports suggest that the narrative sections contained a significantly higher proportion of good news than the statutory accounts sections. Comparison of proportions of bad news, however, indicates that the narrative sections contained a significantly lower proportion of bad news compared to the statutory accounts sections. Finally, the results also suggest that the proportion of good news as compared to bad news in the narrative sections is significantly higher than the proportion of good news compared to bad news in the statutory accounts section. The results are consistent with the suggestion that company management highlights good news in narrative discussions. The implications of the findings for company management, users, auditors and regulators are discussed.
|Subjects:||Technology > Business, Management and Marketing > Accounting|
|Group:||Business School > Centre for Finance and Risk|
|Deposited By:||INVALID USER|
|Deposited On:||29 Sep 2007|
|Last Modified:||07 Mar 2013 14:34|
Document DownloadsMore statistics for this item...
|Repository Staff Only -|
|BU Staff Only -|
|Help Guide -||Editing Your Items in BURO|