Larsen, H. J. and Bennett, M. R., 2020. Empirical Evaluation of the Reliability of Photogrammetry Software in the Recovery of Three-Dimensional Footwear Impressions. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 65 (5), 1722-1729.
Full text available as:
|
PDF (OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE)
1556-4029.14455.pdf - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 2MB | |
PDF
1556-4029.14455.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. 1MB | ||
Copyright to original material in this document is with the original owner(s). Access to this content through BURO is granted on condition that you use it only for research, scholarly or other non-commercial purposes. If you wish to use it for any other purposes, you must contact BU via BURO@bournemouth.ac.uk. Any third party copyright material in this document remains the property of its respective owner(s). BU grants no licence for further use of that third party material. |
Abstract
This paper examines the reliability of Structure from Motion (SfM) photogrammetry as a tool in the capture of forensic footwear marks. This is applicable to photogrammetry freeware DigTrace but is equally relevant to other SfM solutions. SfM simply requires a digital camera, a scale bar, and a selection of oblique photographs of the trace in question taken at the scene. The output is a digital three-dimensional point cloud of the surface and any plastic trace thereon. The first section of this paper examines the reliability of photogrammetry to capture the same data when repeatedly used on one impression, while the second part assesses the impact of varying cameras. Using cloud to cloud comparisons that measure the distance between two-point clouds, we assess the variability between models. The results highlight how little variability is evident and therefore speak to the accuracy and consistency of such techniques in the capture of three-dimensional traces. Using this method, 3D footwear impressions can, in many substrates, be collected with a repeatability of 97% with any variation between models less than ~0.5 mm.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-1198 |
Additional Information: | This research is a part of an on‐going project originally funded by the U.K. Natural Environment Research Council Grant Number NE/M021459/1. |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | 3D ; digital evidence ; evidence recovery ; footwear impression ; reliability testing ; three-dimensional ; validity |
Group: | Faculty of Science & Technology |
ID Code: | 34012 |
Deposited By: | Symplectic RT2 |
Deposited On: | 19 May 2020 08:49 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2022 14:22 |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
Repository Staff Only - |